"Я-а-а - цыга-а-а-нский баро-о-о-он!!!"
Jan. 20th, 2022 10:47 am![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
usy-chapaya.livejournal.com posting in ![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
potsreotizm_newА чё никто про Дворетс 2.0 не пишет?
usy-chapaya.livejournal.com posting in potsreotizm_newusy-chapaya.livejournal.com posting in potsreotizm_new![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2022-01-20 04:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2022-01-20 05:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2022-01-20 05:52 pm (UTC)Толя, ваш Джо Ильич опять понес хрень на публике?
Joe Biden's gaffe may have inadvertently revealed the truth about his Ukraine policy
The President appeared to suggest that a 'minor incursion' by Russia wouldn't result in harsh sanctions.
It was 28 minutes into Joe Biden's press conference when the gaffe came - and it was a jaw-dropper. Especially if you were watching in Kyiv or the Kremlin.
The US President appeared to say that, if Vladimir Putin were to make only a "minor incursion" into Ukraine, then Russia would not face devastating sanctions.
His exact words were: "Russia will be held accountable if it invades. And it depends on what it does. It's one thing if it's a minor incursion and we (in Nato) end up having to fight about what to do and what to not do, etcetera.
"But if they actually do what they're capable of doing, it is going to be a disaster for Russia if they further invade Ukraine."
The comment whizzed around the world and, as the implications of what he had said sank in, a journalist read it back to him.
Was Mr Biden giving "permission" for a "minor incursion" by Russia into Ukraine, the journalist asked.
Mr Biden laughed and said: "Good question. It did sound (like) that, didn't it..."
Whatever he meant, it was an example of Mr Biden saying too much, and talking loosely, a failing for which he has form.
In his first press conference for 78 days, the President was perhaps seeking to demonstrate his command of detail, ultimately speaking for almost two hours.
But the moment he finished White House officials desperately scrambled to "clean up" the remarks on Ukraine.
no subject
Date: 2022-01-20 06:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2022-01-20 06:06 pm (UTC)если в украине отловят трех заблудившихсяихтамнетов, что ната не начнет спорить?
no subject
Date: 2022-01-20 06:56 pm (UTC)Вот что происходит, когда администрация ведущей страны Запада возглавляется сенильным маразматиком и "женщиной с пониженной социальной ответственностью".
no subject
Date: 2022-01-20 07:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2022-01-20 07:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2022-01-20 07:24 pm (UTC)А чего ты так обиделся? Клоун — это не обзывание, а констатация факта. Вполне уважаемая профессия.
no subject
Date: 2022-01-20 07:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2022-01-20 07:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2022-01-20 07:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2022-01-20 07:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2022-01-20 07:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2022-01-20 08:08 pm (UTC)впрочем, во втором я не уверен.
предупреждая следующие вопросы сообщаю: я не считаю байдена сенильным маразматиком и не знаю ни одного специалиста который так считает. и я не знаю кто там "женщина с пониженной социальной ответственностью" и почему меня это должно волновать.
no subject
Date: 2022-01-20 08:17 pm (UTC)русскойамериканской демократии. Иначе никак, а то не поймут.no subject
Date: 2022-01-20 08:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2022-01-20 07:27 pm (UTC)А то сам нихуя не делаешь, а хочешь чтобы кто-то жопу рвал. "Почему это Байден чужих детей на бойню не посылает, пока я на диване негодую?!"